A Vision of Ferocity: My Journey through Symbolism with Fudo Myoo

“This Fudo Myo-o, whose name means “Immovable Wisdom King,” is represented with a sword to cut through our ignorance and a rope to bind up our emotions.” – Miyamoto Musashi

Fudo Myoo, the One & Only

Personal journeys with religious symbols can be harrowing.

There is a figure in Japanese history known as Yuten Shonin (1637-1718), or Saint Yuten. Yuten was a Buddhist monk of the Jodo sect who was not considered very intelligent or gifted in any way. He was particularly terrible at learning his sutras and prayers. His teachers were giving up on him, and he was becoming more desperate, eventually praying to the Buddhist Wisdom King of Japanese Shingon Buddhism known as Fudo Myoo (‘Acala’ being his original Sanskrit name). When he fell asleep after praying to Fudo Myoo, he had a dream of the Wisdom King approaching him, wrapped in a cloak of fire and with a severe look on his face.

In most if not all depictions of Fudo Myoo, he is always holding a sword, Kurikara. This sword is known for cutting through ignorance and delusion, purifying those it touches. With a swift flick of his blade, Fudo had shoved the sword down Yuten’s throat, purifying his body and mind with the fires of awakening. When Yuten woke up the next day, his prayer had been answered. He was now a monk with clear mind and direction. In the ensuing years, he would become an expert on the sutras and a master-class exorcist, renowned throughout all of Japan during the Edo Jidai (1603-1868).

I have a deep fondness for Fudo Myoo. Out of all the symbolic deities and representations of Buddhism, Fudo Myoo is my very favorite. His grimace, the flames that surround him, the sword and noose he bears in his hands – he is not your usual image when you envision Buddhism. He is scary, tough, and unforgiving, attitudes at odds with the picture of serenity, peace, and equanimity associated with Buddhism, and Japan, nowadays. Though if you talked to a Buddhist monk or practitioner, they may tell you of a Zen Master or two they have met that fit Fudo Myoo’s personality. He is a symbol the Western mind does not usually associate with Buddhism, nor one that Western minds usually embrace easily. If there are any types of Buddhism the Westerner readily participates in, it is usually a form of Zen or Theravada that is counter to the symbol-soaked world of High Church Christianity and Sunday School illustrated Bibles.

However, appearances are not everything. While Fudo may appear to be a demon at first glance, his mission is far from anything malicious. He is indeed wrathful, but only for the sake of protecting the Buddha Dharma. These figures are known as “Dharmapali,” literally “Dharma defender.” Interestingly enough, he is also the flip side of the Cosmic Buddha Vairocana, who is considered to be the embodiment of the universal nature of emptiness, thus making him the highest-ranking Cosmic Buddha. What this means is that Vairocana and Fudo Myoo are Buddhist representations of the highest divine powers in the cosmology of esoteric Buddhism. If you were to pick a name to equate with the modern concept of the Judeo-Christian God when it comes to Japanese esoteric Buddhism, it would be Vairocana. If you wanted to go a little more Old Testament, then you would look to Fudo Myoo. But the two are never the same (two religions in general rarely ever are). Where the Old Testament God would turn people to pillars of salt or banish them in the desert for 40 years for breaking his rules, Fudo would not cast you there simply because you broke rules – in fact, he may never give a reason at all why he threw you in the desert. But both would be going it for your own good.

Fudo is not a wrathful or spiteful entity, but the embodiment of that aspect of the “I’m doing this for your own good” mentality existent within the Buddhist tradition. He is protector and guide, symbol of wisdom far beyond the reaches of our normal comprehension. Fudo and his counterpart Vairocana represent the inherent oneness of duality – the reflection of the anger and peacefulness, the silence and cacophony that accompany true enlightenment. Before all else, a symbol is a reflection of those deepest truths of mankind and of the forces within his nature that guide him on the right path without his knowing. Fudo is the fiery and grimacing face of what it means to be compassionate and wise in a world that is unforgiving – sometimes, we just need a good kick in the ass. In this regard, Fudo represents a high ideal for the Buddhist practitioner – the passion within the calm, the resolve and fury that drive us to attain peace and concentration. Protector and defender, warrior and immovable obstacle for all those who wish to defile the pure embodiment of Buddha’s teachings.

fudo-sculpture   Coming to Terms with the Symbolic

There is a Thomas Merton quite from his posthumous work Love and Living I quite like:

“The vital role of the symbol is precisely this: to express and to encourage man’s acceptance of his own center, his own ontological roots is a mystery of being that transcends his individual ego. But when man is reduced to his empirical self and confined within its limits, he is, so to speak, excluded from himself, cut off from his own roots, condemned to spiritual death by thirst and starvation in a wilderness of externals. In this wilderness there can be no living symbols, only the dead symbols of dryness and destruction which bear witness to man’s own inner ruin. But he cannot “see” these symbols, since he is incapable of interior response.”

As Westerners, we live in a society greatly influenced by severe Protestantism. During the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century, new Christian denominations railed against what they saw as the pageantry and idol-worship of High Church traditions, encapsulated within Roman Catholicism and Anglicanism. In the process, they made their churches devoid of imagery, preferring a direct relationship with God through plain means instead of using any sort of ritualistic or symbolic aspects of worship as intermediaries of sorts. This is far different from esoteric Buddhism, otherwise dubbed as ‘Vajrayana Buddhism,’ which freely uses imagery, ritual, meditation, dance, and pageantry to relate to their world and better connect to the enlightened aspects of it. One way this is done is by meditating on images of buddhas and bodhisattvas, gods and goddesses, demons and local spirits. These come in the form of serene beings, multi-limbed deities of destruction, or as artistic representations of universal truths, using pictorial language to describe an indescribable experience. These revolve around exercises done to achieve a relationship with the powers these images represent where you are able to identify yourself with, and ultimately come to understand through meditative exercises, the true nature behind these symbols and the nature of the universe.

The East and West are therefore different in certain respects when it comes to how they embrace their religiosity. Eastern spirituality has the possibility to be more colorful and emotional, while Western religion can be more austere and polite but no less evocative. Both of them revolve around images to some extent, but the way both spiritual cultures have embraced their symbols have been decidedly different. The West looks to their symbols as representations of historical and corporeal reality, seeking to ground their beliefs and spirituality in realistic terms so as to be able to understand it in concrete terms. The East has decidedly rejected historical consciousness. The view of intention meaning more than historical accuracy has created a spiritual culture, especially in Buddhism, where it is more important to analyze the message being communicated through scripture and imagery instead of worrying about whether someone actually said the words or not or actually existed.

Because of these cultural differences, we see the embracing of symbols and their power in very different ways. Westerners have slowly but surely lost touch with many of their symbols and figures and what they may represent within a spiritual context because of how we have historically moved away from understanding their context or intention. This is due to no negligence on the part of those who try their very best to communicate these symbols; they simply have been overtaken by secular ones. Probably the most popular medium through which we recognize secular symbols is through the concept of brands. Brands choose symbols that come to represent ideology and even profit margins, the symbol hiding the reality of the operation that has created the symbol. Meanwhile, in a place like Japan, the image of Fudo Myoo and other religious symbols like him may be seen all too often due to his popularity. Hell, he may even exist in a kawaii anime form.

While the role of religion is rather ambiguous and losing sway in Japan, temples and shrines still stand as monuments in the way the churches and temples of the United States do not. Buddhist temples in Japan have withstood for five hundred years or more, while churches only one hundred years old or younger in the United States have already been re-purposed as bars or concert venues. Symbolic reality and the way we approach it has changed drastically, but it remains vital and relevant to the human experience in every new form. The role of symbol is decidedly different depending on what side of the Pacific Ocean you are on, but no matter the geographical location or context, these symbols make all the difference in how we come to terms with understanding ourselves and our world.

Having said all this about the supposed disconnect between the East and West concerning symbols, I must say this: The West is a very scientifically minded society, and spiritual symbols are definitely not of the scientific variety. Not to say religion and science are necessarily in different categories, but a large Buddhist god with blue skin emblazoned in fire may not exactly equate well with a neurological understanding of the brain. Neurology itself has been important in understanding much of the science behind spirituality, but keeping in line with Merton, it is not the scientific connection with ourselves we are looking for, but the symbolic one. If we do not understand the symbols around us, we cannot begin to understand ourselves. The mind does not communicate with us through our subconscious by means of equations and diagrams, but through symbols and events we barely understand at times.

The collective consciousness Carl Jung studied intently always communicated itself through universal means, ways that everybody could understand. Before we had diagrams, equations, 3-D representations, etc., we had paintings and drawings. On the Caves of Lascaux are representations of the natural the way man best interpreted and envisioned it, and it is that connection with the natural our relationship with symbolic meaning brings us back to in the end. The symbol asks us to consider to not forget the bigger picture, that we see the forest for the trees, but also the trees for the forest. Enlightenment is simply not understanding on a macro scale, but also on a micro scale. As Carl Jung said of the religious symbol:

“It is the role of religious symbols to give a meaning to the life of man. The Pueblo Indians believe that they are the sons of Father Sun, and this belief endows their life with a perspective (and a goal) that goes far beyond their limited existence. It gives them ample space for the unfolding of personality and permits them a full life as complete persons. Their plight is infinitely more satisfactory than that of a man in our own civilization who knows that he is (and will remain) nothing more than an underdog with no inner meaning to his life.”

The lofty symbol insofar as it provides grounding, provides meaning. Conscious rationality and external symbols seek to consolidate man’s journey outwards, to ever greater heights. As Merton and Jung understand it, the internal spiritual symbol does the opposite, putting us in tune with what it is that lies within ourselves and our own consciousness.  Merton himself, belonging to one of the more contemplative Catholic monastic orders, the Cistercians, was a man who knew well what it is that is conjured in the mind of men and women when all other distractions are taken away. The monastery, that silent retreat in the hills and forests and deserts of the world, are close to nature, this attuning the mind and soul to an deeper recognition of the real than what may be found among the concrete and ambitions of urbanity. For Merton and others who took up vows of silence, the closest home they may have ever had in their years of service was their own center. But where does this put Fudo Myoo? Fudo IS the center.

Fudo Myoo, more than any other Buddhist symbol during my years of practice, has come to represent the truth of man’s inner nature and the mission of the Buddhist. He is the “eternal and immutable diamond” of the Dharma. Not only that, he represents the fearful and enigmatic recognition of the power of the symbol for the Westerner who embraces Buddhism. The Western practitioner is usually the type of Buddhist who is seeking to escape the more fantastical trappings of traditional spirituality. This was true for me as well. Being a teenager who encountered Buddhism, the stripped-down, take-no-prisoners style of Zen was refreshing after having practiced only Catholicism for so many years.

For the past fifty to sixty years, Buddhism has been at the center of the liberal Protestant Reformation towards the East so many spiritual travelers embraced as the opposite of the rigid, image-rich, monotone religious traditions they had grown up with. As I studied the history behind these trends, the more I came to realize and accept what seems now to be an all-too-evident truth: Americans accept what they like and throw out all the things they don’t want to understand or be a part of their consciousness. Buddhism was not the stripped down, Eastern Protestantism so many hippies and yuppies had been looking for. Buddhism is not some sort of sleek iPad design where there is no reflection of your inner self except some sort of white serene landscape. Buddhism is a traditional religion as well, and nothing screams traditional and uneasy as Fudo Myoo does.

Fudo Myo-ou, courtesy http://www2.cyberoz.net/city/sanden/jindex.html

Visions of Fire and Gumdrops Dancing in My Head

Being a Western Buddhist is like being that guy who always attempts a diet. You stay on the diet for the first two to three days, maybe even a week, but you eventually fall off the horse. Such is the Western practitioner’s relationship to meditation, especially of the sitting variety. In between graduate school, working two jobs, and my internship, there is not much in the way of free time for…well, much of anything. The meditation group I have attended for the last five years was not a consistent option for me any longer as I had to work in the evenings when I did not have class. This meant I had to find different ways to engage with Buddhist practice and meditation, so I looked up a few methods. One that caught my eye was mantra yoga. I thought it was interesting and easy to slide into, as I was used to remembering and reciting prayers as part of my Catholic school upbringing. I could recite a few mantras here and there on a bus ride home, counting each individual bead on my prayer bracelets to keep track. “Easy,” I thought, “I can do this anywhere I am!”

So I did. Sometimes it would be om mani padme hum. Other times it would be om ma ra pa cha na dhi. I found one in particular I enjoyed, a mantra connected to the esoteric Buddhist tradition known as Shingon that I had started to study: Om Vairocana hum. As I wrote earlier, Vairocana is a Cosmic Buddha, the Supreme One, presenting the highest ideal. As I chanted this mantra, something strange started to happen – visions of a Buddha clothed in pure light started to fill into m head. These were never in my head before, and they did not represent anything I had seen with my own two eyes before. But I knew who it was – Vairocana. My mantra yoga had slowly seeped into dream yoga. As my dream yoga continued, something else started to happen as well. Vairocana started to slowly, but ever so surely, change into Fudo Myoo.

“What the hell is going on?”

In trying to understand what was going on in my head, I called up a friend of mine who is more knowledgeable about these matters and explained the matter to him. “It sounds like synchronicity, my brother,” he said. “Jung talked about it. You’re delving into some deep stuff.” The guru had led me on the trail of another spiritual journey, as he had always done. I looked into the matter and found information regarding what synchronicity exactly was. I had studied Jung before, reading up on his works that dealt with the collective unconscious and his research on alchemy, but I never thought one of his teachings would actually be a reality in my life. Jung described synchronicity as “temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events.” He put it in better terms when he later also described it as an “acausal connecting principle,” which meant that the fact that I was seeing Fudo Myoo in my dreams had no explanations from my daily life that would suffice. In a way, it was simply happening. There had been no conversion experience, no large upheaval i the way I approached meditation, even with the turn to different methods. There was simply a connection, a connection I had to accept. After practicing Zen Buddhism for six years, I had delved headfirst into a type of Buddhist practice and symbolism that I had never even been aware of  up until there was a blue ferocious deity all up in my face.

The more I delved into the experience I had with Fudo Myoo, the less it seemed like synchronicity and the more it appeared to be what Jung termed “Incoincident.” Incoincident is when you find out that at what first appeared to be coincidence turns out to be connected – “It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backward,” Jung had said.

Awe. Jung said I had a poor memory. How sweet.

I had thought he came out of nowhere, but when you start to chant the name of Fudo’s Cosmic counterpart, Vairocana, then some strange things are bound to happen. But why was it not Vairocana that came to me in these “visions” then? I had not done anything that was special of actually called upon certain particular deities, because I don’t believe the power to call upon deities to invade your membrane exists in the first place. Then I started to dig deeper…and deeper…and deeper…

I had typed “Fudo Myoo Japanese Buddhism” into Google. This is the page that came up.

Turns out there had always been a connection between Fudo and myself, I had just accidentally flipped the switch to ON. What Buddhist minks on Mount Koya intentionally attempt to do some complete doofus in Pittsburgh had accidentally done through years of floundering through Buddhism. Born in 1993, Fudo was considered my patron saint of sorts in the context of Shingon Buddhism. Fudo protects all those born under the sign of the Rooster. That being the case, Fudo had more right to be in my head than I had initially thought – my Chinese zodiac sign gave me a natural predisposition towards the visage and symbol of Fudo Myoo. Coming to those who called upon him, or those he deemed needed him, Fudo is the Buddhist Wisdom King that seeks to protect the world from evil spirits and convert nonbelievers. However, I was neither an evil spirit (at least I don’t think I am), nor was I a nonbeliever, having practiced and studied Buddhism since I was fourteen years old. But, I did just start learning about Shingon Buddhism.

Shingon Buddhism is the only other school of Vajrayana (Thunderbolt Vehicle) Buddhism that exists other than Tibetan Buddhism. Tibetan and Shingon Buddhism have acclimated to their cultural trappings, but have their origin in the Yogacara school of Buddhism from Ancient India. While the practices of each have tended to become acclimated to their cultural surroundings, they both retain the practice of focusing on deities and sacred syllables. These manifest themselves in the manner of the Transformation Technique and Image-Manifesting Technique. The Transformation Technique begins with a practitioner focusing on a sacred syllable, in this instance it would be the sacred syllable of Fudo Myoo. After he focuses on the sacred syllable, he starts to transform it within his mind into an object associated with the deity, in this case it would be Fudo’s sword Kurikara. In this way, the practitioner themselves becomes Kurikara, embodying the nature of the sword to slice through evil and purify the Dharma. After the characteristics of Kurikara have been taken on by the practitioner, they then move on to visualizing Fudo himself. In visualizing Fudo Myoo, they learn to associate themselves with and gradually embody Fudo as well, merging themselves with the characteristics of the deity.

The Image-Manifesting Technique is itself a little more straightforward but more difficult to pull off. In this exercise, you subsume the body of the deity into your own. Imagine someone shrinking Fudo down to bite size and then eating him. After you have brought the deity into your own body, you are to imagine the deity taking your boy over, with the process happening in reverse, with the deity taking your body in his/her/it’s own. After you have gone through these two steps, they then merge – you are the deity and the deity is you. These are two different methods that are not supposed to make a human realize any sort of god-like powers, but to make the person more familiar with his or her own buddhahood, creating a conscious understanding of his or her own nature that leaves them more enlightened than they were before. Excluding any claims to enlightenment, I realized that I had fumbled my way into these two processes.

Utilizing visualization and chanting techniques as a way to supplement sitting practice, as well as using them in earlier instances of meditative practice throughout the years, probably helped lead to the moment where I started to envision Fudo Myoo. Fudo also being connected to me through my zodiac sign was only one of many other factors that may have brought the Wisdom King to the forefront of my mind. Focusing on sacred syllables and chants, which then turned into the bodies of Vairocana and Fudo perfectly fit the bill of the Transformation Technique, just not as it is usually achieved in the structured environment of the Shingon Buddhist Monastery. My own experiences have also made me realize how close the Transformation Technique is to the Image-Manifesting Technique, as the two easily bleed into each other if you stay conscious of the symbols your mentality has become accustomed to through practice. As the images of Fudo were always across from me in my mind, as the deity and practitioner usually face each other in the diagrams detailing the Image-Manifesting Technique, the practice of subsuming the other starts from there. This technique happens naturally through mindfulness and meditative practices, as long as your focus stays on the symbol that you have focused on or has revealed itself to you. Every time Fudo comes into my mind now, it is not simply Fudo himself that enters my mind, we are one and the same. Both covered in flames, both with blue skin, both carrying Kurikara. Words cannot express how awesome this feels!

If this sounds weird to you, do not doubt how weird it must have been for myself as someone who practices Buddhism but was never attracted to these esoteric practices. They always seemed far-fetched and rather antiquated techniques, ones that had their origin in what I believed to be outmoded forms of spiritual practice. I had been running away from symbols and their meaning, thinking they had no connection to my own experience and spirituality as I engaged with it from day to day. As with Jung, I came to see and experience symbols within the chambers of my own mind. As I engaged with these techniques more and more, I started to see Fudo as an expression of my own experience and consciousness, with Jung’s words once again ringing in my ears:

“…[this] light was my consciousness, the only light that I have. My own understanding is the sole treasure I possess, and the greatest.”

Fudo Myoo was my consciousness expressing itself and making itself known through symbols that I could come to understand and accept more than it if it was a Hindu or Jewish symbol. Yet, I still had to learn how to interpret and come to know what message my consciousness was trying to communicate through the figure of Fudo Myoo.

Symbols as Messengers

“Lay practice is not like a monk’s job – it is how to help other people. First your family, then your friends, then your country and all beings: helping them is your obligation.” – Seung Sahn

As I stated earlier in this essay, Fudo is considered a Dharmapali, a defender of the Dharma and making sure it stays pure through the ages. Fudo comes off as ferocious to keep the evil-hearted at bay and strike fear in them for not following Buddhist teachings. As Fudo Myoo is described here:

“Fudo Myoo has a scary appearance to be able to frighten people into accepting…salvation…he converts anger into compassion and cuts the ties of negative feelings and demons to liberate us from suffering through self-control. He…battles evil with his immovable faith and his compassion.” 

Fudo represents the tenacity and passionate purity of the Dharma expressed through Buddhism as it is practiced by those who follow the path laid out by the Buddha himself. The path of the Dharma is not always peaceful and serene, just like everyone else, Buddhists can be angry and frustrated. But it is the duty of the Buddhist to use these feelings and transform them. Especially of the lay practitioner of Buddhism, of which I am one. We need to use all the various feelings that well up in us any given day and transform them into bodhicitta – the motivation for enlightenment and for all beings, brought about by great compassion we have for all beings. All the anger and hate the circumstances of our lives outside a monastery may well up within our being have to be tempered and transformed into mahakaruna – great compassion. Once we are able to make mahakaruna the center of our practice, of our discipline, of our daily action, we need to use this to bring the message of the Dharma to the world, a message that is supposed to bring peace and equanimity to all sentient beings. Just as Fudo Myoo did for Yuten he does for all those who he is a symbol of Buddhism for – he purifies the negativity within us so we can use it for goodness and the benefit of our fellow men. If anything, my mind was able to use Fudo as a symbol of what the purpose of my lay practice was supposed to be, and how the life a lay practitioner leads is one where he defends and propagates the Dharma through his or her actions in a world reticent to accept the teachings of the Buddha and let go of its ego-fueled illusion.

Fudo Myoo’s appearance also made me realize the importance of symbols and that running away from them in my life was futile. My brain, while eventually being able to comprehend and extrapolate upon abstract concepts, was never quite good at approaching the world through a logical and scientific lens. The religious, spiritual, and philosophical was always an easier way to approach the heavier ideas about life before I encountered them through the lens of science or math. Whether my mind veered one way or another, the symbols through which the abstractions of the universe are communicated would always be a constant. The idea of Fudo Myoo and what he represents being any less real than algebraic and geometric diagrams and symbols was false, a conclusion my post-modern mentality had already made about the older ways of the world. Just because a symbol seems less scientific or understandable makes it no less real and efficacious – in fact, if we have never encountered such a symbol, it may just give us the jolt we need. Symbols bring us back to the roots of a living, breathing tradition, the fruits of the human capacity to use inexplicable means to understand the world.

Symbols are a vital part of not only experimentation and communication with our own consciousness, but of grounding us in our experience of the world. We may spend days where we are grateful and selfless and others where we are selfish and angry, clouded by the needs and desires of our own ego-self. The symbols of our world can be archetypal, or as stated earlier, historical. They can lift us up out of the darkness of ego-self and make us realize the trials and tribulations of our own lives have been shared by others who have come before us. While we may not be monks or saints or great leaders of any sort, connecting with these symbols help us realize our capacity for greatness, to stand for truth and love in a world that desperately needs a lot of it. We can be the ones to give it to the world. Whether the symbol is an archetypal and metaphorical expression of certain aspects of our universe and our consciousness like Vairocana and Fudo Myoo, or an expression of real people, such as the saints or inspirational figures, they connect us with a fundamental aspect of life – ourselves and, in turn, each other.

 

 

Notes From The Classroom: Teaching Hinduism

“The moment I have realized God sitting in the temple of every human body, the moment I stand in reverence before every human being and see God in him – that moment I am free from bondage, everything that binds vanishes, and I am free.” – Swami Vivekananda

After a week of straight classes in Homestead, PA, I returned to the Social Studies classroom at Arsenal Middle School in the Pittsburgh neighborhood of Lawrenceville on January 8th. I had been preoccupied with my own grad classes, so I did not know what to expect when I re-entered the classroom. I knew we were learning about Ancient India, but with how the last three units went (Prehistory, Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt), I assumed we would still be studying geography or agriculture. When my mentor teacher told me he had already introduced Hinduism to the students, I was surprised. I was also thrilled, because having majored in Religious Studies, Hinduism was something I could have fun with.

“My specialty,” I thought.

The Difficulty

India is a tough nut to crack in terms of teaching history. Not because the history is hard to figure out or learn, but because there is so much of it! The Indians developed very early on. There is evidence of plumbing technology in Mohenjo-Daro to rival Rome centuries before that western empire even existed. The Ancient Indians also figured out the Earth was round thousands of years before Europeans would stop thinking of it being flat by simply looking at the shadow of the Earth on the moon during an eclipse (though the concept of a Flat Earth was itself debunked in Europe long before Columbus sailed to America in 1492). Among these achievements, you have the various different empires, their rulers, those who conquered them, and so on and so forth until you get yourself caught up in a complicated cultural menagerie that is difficult to explain. Hinduism is not the least of those complicated subjects, one part of that being due to its continued relevance in the human psyche.

Unlike other religions that are taught in World History, Hinduism is not a dead religion. Sure, there may be those neo-pagan cults here and there that worship Ra or Baal, but for the most part, Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Mesopotamian religions do not hold the same sort of cultural capital they used to. This is exactly the opposite. As the centuries and then millennia have passed, Hinduism has only continued to excite the imagination of Indians everywhere more and more. From polytheism, to Upanishadic monotheism, to Bhagavan mystical theism, Hinduism and its belief structure has taken many forms over the lifetime of the religion, and just as no two Catholics practice their religion the same, there are definitely no two Hindus that practice their religion the same either.

Any teacher of comparative religion or theology would it difficult to explain Hinduism to adults let alone to middle school students. Here is a question to test my statement: What is the difference between brahmin, brahman, and brahma?

Answers:

brahmin – Vedic Hindu Priest

Brahman – The monotheistic understanding of God in Hinduism; the “Oversoul”

Brahma – The Creator god with three heads. Not predominantly worshiped in modern Hinduism

Those are the answers, but chances are there’s still plenty more about those words that need to be unpacked before you even start to understand what the difference exactly is between Brahma and Brahman, what the word “Vedic” means, and so on. Once again, like the history of India, the concepts and ideas of Hinduism are quite a lot to unpack as well. There are straightforward answers to many questions, but then there are those aspects of any religion that only become more nuanced and opaque as you delve deeper into them.

The Gateway 

Then how does one make Hinduism understandable to students in a middle school setting? It’s not like you can broach the topic of philosophy or theology when it comes to Hinduism with the students, or talk about the intricacies of yoga or the like. However, there’s a basis for everything, and Hinduism finds its basis in it many gods.

The answer to the question “How many Hindu gods are there?” is usually 300 million. Hinduism is not so much a syncretic (the combination of different schools of thought ) religion so much as it is a religion of synthesis. The disparate gods and goddesses of Indo-Aryan, Tamil, and various other cultures that existed in the Indian subcontinent have come together in one single religion, if you even want to call Hinduism a religion. Different gods from vastly different villages became placeholders for Vishnu or Indra, and the combination of different goddesses would culminate in deities such as Devi, the Mother Goddess of all. Surya, the Hindu sun god, who drove his chariot across the sky bringing the sun with him, is said to have even inspired the Roman sun god Sol Invictus, with the similarities in action and function being unlike other sun gods from Hellenistic areas. These different gods and goddesses bring flavor and create a gateway to teaching a religion and culture that otherwise may be alien. Unlike Christianity with its abstract idea of a Triune God, or the Buddhist concept of nirvana, the Hindu pantheon brings color and vivacity unlike other religions I have studied.

Kali, the goddess of death and warfare. Ganesha, the god of wisdom with the head of an elephant. Hanuman, the god of the apes and attendant to Rama, the avatar of Vishnu. Shiva Nataraja, the destroyer-creator who keeps the balance of the universe through acts of spiritual annihilation and rebirth. With images both serene and terrifying, Hinduism evokes the imagination through idols and artwork students do not see in their usual environments. To them, it’s a whole different way of approaching and envisioning religion and divinity. Whether you are in a public or private school, the students have reactions and connections to these representations you may be hard pressed to find when talking about other religions. Students do not often identify with ancient Egyptian or Roman gods. The only corollary I could possibly think of the fascination some students have with Greek mythology.

Greek gods are chaotic and narcissistic, representatives of an uncaring universe,  while Hindu deities themselves are essentially the universe. Whereas Greek gods do not play by the rules, Hindu gods enforce the rules by bending them. You can make this clear to the students through the plethora of fantastic stories that exist about Hinduism. Krishna, the cowherd who easily bested the strongest men as a child and whose mother saw the entirety of the universe when he opened his mouth. Or Rama, who broke the divine bow and defeated all the mortal men to win the hand of his wife-to-be, Sita. The Hindu gods do not interfere in the affairs of the world so much as they are a part of the order of the world. Whereas other gods are far off and living in places such as Mt. Olympus or the Underworld, the Hindu gods are a living part of the universe they helped create.

In this way, the Hindu gods are instantly more relatable for students and teachers alike. We can see the universal story of individuals, whether heroes or villains, play out in these ancient stories the way they may play out in their modern ones, just with different heroes in such figures as Batman or The Flash. The Hindu gods are a good way to explain difficult concepts and ideas we find throughout Indian history and culture, but also provide something that goes one step further – a living, breathing, and imaginative tradition of how humans have come to understand the universe and our place in it. Hindu gods and goddesses are continuing to help future generations become excited and curious about their world in their infinite and eternal capacity as teachers to us all.

Shobogenzo & Zenki: Dogen on Life and Death

Now that we have introduced our audience to the basics of what Zen may entail for the practitioner, we will dive right into one of the greatest minds Japanese Buddhism has to offer – Dogen Zenji (1200-1253). While Buddhist philosophy is dense, hopefully this exposure to Dogen and commentary on a single chapter of his magnum opus, Shobogenzo, will encourage those who read this not to be deterred if they ever encounter Buddhist philosophy in the future.

The Master

Dogen Zenji is the founder of the Japanese Soto school of Zen Buddhism, and one of the greatest philosophical minds to come out of Japan and the Zen tradition. Rehabilitating the Japanese Zen tradition after it was subsumed by the larger and more influential Tendai school of thought, Dogen traveled all the way to China to relearn Zen as it was practiced before being diluted by more esoteric schools of thought. China is the place where Dogen believed he would find Zen in its purest form.

From there, the rest tends to become history as they say. He returned to Japan, and immediately found push back from the Tendai religious authorities in the capital. In response, Dogen relocated his Soto school to Fukui Prefecture, where he established his first temple, Eihei-ji (Eternal Peace), then known as Sanshoho Daibutsuji (a possible reference to the four Buddhist guardians who used to protect the temple). At this place of residence he trained monks and wrote down the rules and philosophy for his school in the Eihei Koroku and Shobogenzo. Of these two texts, the latter has had the more definitive impact on Japanese and Western Zen.

The difficult part about explaining the Shobogenzo is that the Shobogenzo is difficult to explain in the first place. An altogether comprehensive document, the Shobogenzo is a cumulative and exhaustive synthesis of the ideas and teachings of a single Zen master over a lifetime of arduous work and introspection. On one level, it is simply another clandestine philosophical document in a long line of great Mahayana (“Great Vehicle”) Buddhist philosophy hearkening back to the Zen roots of Yogacara and Madhyamika thought.  On another level, the Shobogenzo is to Japanese and Buddhist philosophy what Hegel’s philosophy of phenomenology was to Existentialism and the Berlin school of thought – both redefining and definitive in many aspects.

Dogen was able to explain in the Shobogenzo what some Zen Masters had been teaching wordlessly to their students for centuries. As a document, it continues to be an expression of concepts and views that may have otherwise been lost over the eight hundred years that have passed since Dogen wrote it during the duration of his brief time in this world. Just as Hakuin, Ryokan, Kukai, and Ikkyu sought to recapture the spirit of Buddhism in Japan through their works, so Dogen sought to solidify the spirit of Zen he had found  in China for generations to come. And the funny part of this is that Dogen’s insight into the predicament that would befall later generations actually had some truth to it. High Buddhist Philosophy in Dogen’s own Soto school would fall to the wayside. When his work was found again in the nineteenth century, it brought philosophical thought back to the forefront of modern Japanese Zen.

The Shobogenzo was a much more esoteric text than it is today. Written in the classical Japanese language and calligraphy of the Kamakura Jidai (1185-1333), most Zen monks of the Soto school forgot how to read the text altogether. This issue was only compounded by Soto Zen’s turn to the more mystical Buddhist philosophy of one of Dogen’s successors, Keizan Jokin (1268-1325). Due to these and other internal issues, the text was lost until the nineteenth century, when Japanese scholars and Orientalists rediscovered the text and translated it into modern Japanese and then into other various languages. The rediscovery of the Shobogenzo led to a burgeoning interest in Dogen’s Soto philosophy among Japanese Buddhists and academics and eventually Western practitioners as well, though it would take them a while to get to a point of familiarity with Zen to even broach the Shobogenzo.

Even after all this talk about the Shobogenzo, it’s historical origins and implications, you probably are left wondering about it. If this text is so important to philosophy and Buddhist thought, then, as a possible philosophy major or Buddhist who is reading this article, why have you never heard of it? There are two immediate answers to that:

  1. Western philosophy has had a tendency to focus on analytic philosophy for the last three decades, even ignoring their own traditions found within Continental philosophy. This alone is damaging enough to Western philosophy and its survival within the popular mindset.
  2. Western Buddhism does not tend to hit upon the larger philosophical topics and authors of the religion, such as that of shunyata (emptiness) and Nagarjuna. This is due to Western Buddhism’s inordinate attention on mindfulness and self-help. In my opinion, this has cost Western Buddhism the respect of those interested in philosophy and has brought about a great deal of reliance on ceremonialism, clericalism, and even worse, pseudo-buddhism. Meditation is the root of Buddhist practice and is an important part of the philosophy of the Buddha himself, but familiarity with Buddhist thought has to be ingrained in the Western community if it seeks to continue for generations to come.

As a person who grew up Catholic, many people find it difficult to ultimately leave behind the ideas and ideals of Catholicism because of the ingrained philosophical tradition that exists within that religion. Just as Catholics become familiar with their own philosophy, Buddhists need to know their own traditions and ideas if they are to pass on a living, breathing tradition that continues to edify and enervate the Western mind. It is for this sake that I am starting this series of commentaries on the Shobogenzo. Others have come before (shout-out to Brad Warner), but the number is few and there need to be those who continue the tradition of engaging with these texts so as to transmit the message to the next generation. Zen may be a tradition of wordless transmission, but it is through the medium of word that man continues to engage with his world. So, for the sake of engaging with the world and engaging with the Shobogenzo, the first of hopefully many “Zen Millenial Shobogenzo Commentaries” is underway.

Dogen’s ShobogenzoZenki Commentary

First off, I am by no means an expert on the Shobogenzo. I have not dedicated my “entire life” to studying it because I haven’t lived much of life yet and there are many more things I want to do other than read the works of one, singular person. I write as a spiritual practitioner and everyday person writing for spiritual practitioners and everyday people. My commentary and essays are informed by personal experiences and thoughts and insights I have meditated on.

In the Zenki, there is a passage we can isolate to get to the heart of what Dogen is attempting to tell us:

“The Great Path of the Buddhas, in its consummation, is passage to freedom, is actualization. That passage to freedom, in one sense, is that life passes through life to freedom, and death too passes through death to freedom. Therefore, there is leaving life and death, there is entering life and death; both are the Great Path of consummation. There is abandoning life and death, there is crossing over life and death; both are the Great Path of consummation.

Actualization is life, life is actualization. When that actualization is taking place, it is without exception the complete actualization of life, it is the complete actualization of death. This pivotal working can cause life and cause death. At the precise moment of the actualization of this working, it is not necessarily great, not necessarily small, not all-pervasive, not limited, not extensive, not brief.

The present life is in this working, this working is in the present life. Life is not coming, not going, not present, not becoming. Nevertheless, life is the manifestation of the whole works, death is the manifestation of the whole works. Know that among the infinite things in oneself, there is life and there is death. One should calmly think: is this present life, along with the myriad things concomitant with life, together with life or not? There is nothing at all, not so much as one time or one phenomenon, that is not together with life. Even be it a single thing, a single mind, none is not together with life.”

What Dogen is proposing is nothing if not revolutionary in a way: life does not happen without something to do the living.

1. Life & Death

What are the implications of this view?

Was there not life when the Big Bang occurred? Did not the smallest molecules an single-celled organisms live?

Were not the dinosaurs alive in a more ferocious manner than we could ever fathom?

What is it that makes our experience and relation to life any more pronounced and extraordinary than for those creatures who came before us?

The answer to these questions is that, yes, beings and creatures other than humans have lived and will continue to live, but it is our conscious act of living that gives life that quality of consciousness in the first place. Our actions and being are a part of what defines the use and nature of time and space. Our mere existing is actualized buddhahood, because to awake ourselves to a sense of being, to a sense of “The Now,” is to be fully immersed in all the threads of action and intent that have brought us to this very moment. This leads into one of Dogen’s more radical conceptualizations: being-time.

There is a lot that goes into the concept of being-time, but for now, let us interpret it as the fact that there is no time or moment without something there experiencing the time or moment. If it was not for the quality of something being in the first place, there would be no sense of time that we could hold onto in the way we may experience it every day. Hence, “actualization is life, life is actualization.” Only in the presence of life , and death, can time and moment take on form and action.

Which brings me to an earlier part in the passage:

“…life passes through life to freedom, and death too passes through death to freedom. Therefore, there is leaving life and death, there is entering life and death…”

As I pointed out in my earlier essay, there is a way of looking at Zen as “the great work of life and death.” These words and what they mean to us – life and death – carry a lot of weight within Buddhist doctrine. In looking at this aspect of Dogen’s Zenki, we may want to pay mind to the Mahayana Buddhist philosophy spelled out in the brief Heart Sutra:

“All things are empty:
Nothing is born, nothing dies,
nothing is pure, nothing is stained,
nothing increases and nothing decreases.”

Pay close attention to the second line of this passage from the Heart Sutra. “Nothing is born, nothing dies” – surely this must be a mistake. We see things come into this world of existence and depart from it all the time. What do Buddhists mean when they say they believe nothing is born and nothing dies? Life cannot be non-life, and death cannot be non-death. Out of all the assurances we have in this world, it is that we come into it alone and we leave this world alone. However, ask yourself – what is it that perishes? Do you perish? Does the Jeffery, or Miranda, or Gerald that people knew, is that what perishes?

Or does this concept we have of a static, unchanging self at the center of constantly changing phenomena have a flaw in it somewhere?

When Dogen says “life passes through life to freedom” and “death passes through death to freedom,” these are not simple statements admonishing us to live a good life or to die like a hero. Instead, it asks us to go a step further and realize the thin boundary between what we view as definite states of existence and non-existence may be fuzzier than we had imagined before. In fact, the boundary we thought existed between these two states may not exist in the way we imagine it at all. When we live, we have to contrast it with the extreme opposite that we think of, and that is death. However, death itself is simply a consequence of being alive, and guess what, being both lifeless and deathless was the antecedent to our lives as we currently live them. What Dogen, and Buddhist philosophy in general, is trying to make us see is that the labels we put on ephemeral states do not make the states themselves any more lasting or concrete. They are simply one among many types of states of being in this universe that come and go. To be free, we must live a life not beholden to the concept of life, just as we should not die beholden to the concept of death. While Zen strips our consciousness down to the basics – which life and death are – it also makes us go one step further. To peer over the cliff into the vast expanse below to glimpse what we were too afraid to look at before. Zen makes us look at what may lie beyond life and death. Just as it says at the end of the Heart Sutra:

“Gone,
gone,
gone over,
gone fully over.
Awakened!
So be it!”

2. “The Whole Works” 

The word Zenki itself is a Japanese term meaning “the whole works.” In this sense, talking about life and death for Dogen is not a morbid subject, but a discussion of all that Buddhist practice encompasses and reveals through the quieting of the mind and working through the illusion we have set up for ourselves. When we talk about the whole works, we want to refer to a passage from earlier:

The present life is in this working, this working is in the present life. Life is not coming, not going, not present, not becoming. Nevertheless, life is the manifestation of the whole works, death is the manifestation of the whole works. Know that among the infinite things in oneself, there is life and there is death.”

To build on it, here are two other sections from later in Zenki:

“…the principle of in life the whole works appears has nothing to do with beginning and end; though it is the whole earth and all space, not only does it not block the appearance of the whole works in life, it doesn’t block the appearance of the whole works in death either. When the whole works appears in death, though it is the whole earth and all space, not only does it not block the appearance of the whole works in death, it doesn’t block the appearance of the whole works in life either. For this reason, life doesn’t obstruct death, death doesn’t obstruct life.”

“In the manifestation of the whole works these is life and there is death.”

When we look at these passages as a whole, not only do you the reader now have a practically complete picture of Zenki in Dogen’s Shoogenzo, but you have access to a critical core tenet of a Buddhist understanding of the world: interdependence. Interdependence is a nifty way of saying that all things are united, but instead of simply being united, they are formed because of the interaction of these forces in the world, and contain a bit of each other as well. If that sounds Taoist to you, well then, congratulations, because Taoism is in Zen’s DNA from it’s days as Ch’an in China. Just as there is yang in yin, and vice versa, in the Tao, each thing in the universe contains its opposite.

This may seem odd to us:

“Does peace contain war?”

“Does a dog have a part of a cat?”

“Does vanilla ice cream have a part of chocolate ice cream in it?”

Dogen is not making this point by accident. The issue may have been just as difficult for his students to grasp eight hundred years ago as it is for us today. When he points out that life does not obstruct death, death does not obstruct life, and that the whole works exists in both, he is showing that interdependence is not a viewpoint that settles for simplistic notions of one thing literally being within another. What interdependence makes us realize is that we are in a complicated relationship with our surroundings. Just as a mother and father take care of the child, so do the sun, rain, trees, and ground take care of us by providing us nourishment and new life. The crux of interdependence is all things are intimately connected. All things are in relation to another. If this is true, where do I begin and the other thing/being end?

In answering this question, we see interdependence naturally seeps into the philosophy of shunyata, or emptiness. Emptiness, in the Buddhist sense, has a lot in common with the Buddha’s conceptual model of anatman (non-self). Interdependence and emptiness, as Buddhism largely does, puts aside the notion of self. This “self” we believe in is a construct of our opinions, views, knowledge, and more. The life we are currently living is predicated on the notion that there is some thing that is actually there to experience itself, and the world around it, this whole time. If we have the courage to let go of this sense of self, this “ego-I,” then we penetrate into a deeper truth – the stuff behind the self. The mishmash of threads and circumstances that have brought us to this particular body, in this particular time, in this particular place, on this particular day. Once we are privy to these aspects of self, of what has come together to make this self, we see these particularities and pick them apart, thread by thread. When the threads that made you up have unraveled, what is left of what is it that we are? For many, this is where Zen practice starts.

However, Dogen is also attempting to say something else through his Zenki chapter as well. That is, while the idea of self is illusory and ill-advised, being itself is something that is actually there. While there is no self that may be there, in the end, we continue to be. All the people we have been and all the people we have met; all the situations and events of our life; all the books we have read and experience we have gained – all of these things are caught up in one another. There is no separation between any of it. While our idea of who we are and how we continue to live and die may be revolutionized, we continue to be and never stop being. Everything that has ever been and ever will be – that is contained in us. It is contained in the universe. You are the universe. Dogen is asking you: How does it feel to be the universe, to be the whole works?

Well, go on – how does it feel?

The Shobogenzo translation that was used for this essay was from Thomas Cleary’s book, “Shobogenzo: Zen Essays by Dogen (1986)”

 

 

 

 

Breaking the Bright Mirror into a Million Pieces

“Bodhi is originally without any tree;
The bright mirror is also not a stand.
Originally there is not a single thing —
Where could any dust be attracted?”

-Hui-Neng, Sixth Patriarch of Zen Buddhism

Imagine

Imagine looking at yourself in a mirror.

You study every feature on your face. Every crease, every wrinkle. Every hair and follicle. Every pore and hole. You smile, revealing your half-yellow, half-white teeth. You make your eyes bug out, not being able to decide whether they are too big or just the right size.

You know your eyebrows are too big, everyone always told you that. Bushy and brown, they are an ecosystem unto themselves. They need tending and care, the sort of tending and care that only you would notice and no one else.

Those ears. Those ears are okay, though. You’ve seen a lot of ears in your day, and you can unilaterally say you have some of the best ears you’ve seen. They’re nothing to brag about, but they’re not terrible, and for that, you’re grateful. Someone may have been watching out for you at the moment of your creation.

Your nose, a little bulbous. This perturbs you because you know noses only get bigger as time goes on. No one wants a bigger nose, you tell yourself, but everyone else learns how to deal with it, so you don’t make too much of a fuss over it. At least your lips are not too big or too small. Just right.

Then imagine that mirror breaks into a million pieces. There’s no reflection anymore, just you staring at nothingness and nothingness staring back at you. You put your hand and arm forward to reach out, but nothing’s there. As your reflection goes, you go. Everything you saw yourself as and saw as a part of you is annihilated. Nothing to see and nothing to be. Nothing to do and nothing to act upon. You open your mouth to shout, but you hear nothing. Even if you did hear it, would it be you screaming if you had no mouth to scream with?

Now you are staring back at yourself. You see yourself, but you really don’t see anything. Only that nothingness you peer at is more you than the features you were looking at now. Where others may see blackness, you see definition. Where others see empty space, you see yourself as one part of a void filling all and being all.

Then, a blinding light. You are back in front of the mirror, with your just-right-lips, your bulbous eyes and too-big-nose, those bushy eyebrows you pay so much attention to. All those features are in front of the mirror again, and are staring back at you through the mirror.

But are you there?

Zen dismantles you, and I’m not quite sure it puts you back together again. Zen isn’t sure there really is a “you” to put together in the first place. It asks the practitioner to really think about what it is we are in the first place.

Well, what are you?

“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”

Be careful how you answer, or you may be condemned to Hell for a thousand years.

The Great Work

Why Zen? Well, what is Zen? You may have a hundred questions as to what Zen really is. You may have thought that it meant peace, bliss, tranquility, etc. Did you know it meant “concentration?” Derived from the Sanskrit word Dhyana, which became Ch’an when it hit China and Son when it found its way into Korea, and finally Zen when it settled in Japan, Zen is a school of thought in Buddhism that seeks to find enlightenment through the act of silent, absorbing meditation. The “I-Thou” is dismantled, the objective and subjective cease to have differences. The only sounds you hear are your breathing and the chirping of the cicada, which are the same sound.

The truth is Zen’s literal translation is “concentration,” but the truth is that words honestly mean nothing and that whatever meaning you attach to them is just as significant and important as the definition that appears in the pages of Merriam-Webster Dictionary. There is a way of looking at and defining Zen that I like far more than the definition we find in the dictionary. The Zen Master Seung Sahn (1927-2004) defined Zen as “the great work of life and death.” Defining Zen in this manner makes it more than simple concentration – our life depends on it.

What does this imply when it comes to practicing Zen? To practice Zen is to practice the art of living. To live is to be aware, awake, cognizant of what you are and what is in your surroundings. Most of the time we do not so much live as survive, and if all we do with the time we have is survive, then what was the point of living in the first place? Life is something you have to work at and with, not against, as so many of us do. We go against the direction life is pulling us in, against the tide of change that inevitably comes with being alive. Zen sits you down and tells you not to rush through or against the flow, but to stay still within it.

Death is another matter entirely. Just as Zen teaches us to live, it teaches us to die. To die to ego, to the idea we have of ourselves, of others, of what life supposed to be. To die to life, and to live with the knowledge that death is with us when all is said and done. Just as death gives way to life, life gives way to death. If it was not for the cycle of change, death, and renewal, life would not continue to go on and thrive. Without death, life would stagnate, bereft of the glaring definition it gains when compared against death. Zen sees the end in the beginning and the beginning in the end. When sitting still, breathing in, and breathing out, you notice you are on the precipice of death. It was always there. You just never noticed.

Zen is “the great work of life and death” simply because life and death is all there is when everything else is stripped away. Your ego, zen, the world and your body – when we tear ourselves away from all the words and concepts that constantly bind us, all there ever was or will be was the beginning and the end. Zen is what comes in between.

Look at the mirror again and tell me – was there ever a mirror there to begin with?